NVIDIA GTX600 Series (Kepler)

[Thaedass]

Svasta cu jos procitati..

[Typhoon]

GTX 660 je u rangu sa 7870, a ne sa 7850.

[Doomche]

@NastyB - ne znam da li trolujesh, volish da teoretishesh, mislish da zhivish u nekoj ogromnoj teoriji zavere gde su svi placeni, a samo ti u pravu, ili jednostavno nemash elementarno znanje o aktuelnom hardveru da bi o tome mogli da raspravljamo. Ovo shto si napisao je gomila gluposti. Mozhda cesh moj pristup oceniti kao agresivan i kakav god, ali ja ne znam drugi nachin da ti to saopshtim, poshto je na lep nachin vec pokushano.

1. Lepo su ti rekli - shader kod nVidia i ATI kartica nije iste snage. Ne zato shto je nVidia ne znam koliko naprednija, vec jednostavno imaju drugachiji pristup izradi chipa i tako je vec godinama. ATI gura veci broj shadera manje snage, nVidia gura manji broj shadera (odnosno CUDA jezgara) vece snage. Da ono shto si napisao ima veze sa zdravim mozgom, svi bi imali samo ATI kartice jer one uvek imaju vishe shadera.

2. Teza dva - na sajtu koji linkujesh (koji obichno u obzir uzimaju chlanovi foruma koji veze sa vezom nemaju o hardveru) lepo pishe disclaimer, ali je teshko chitati:

Please note that the above 'benchmarks' are all just theoretical - the results were calculated based on the card's specifications, and real-world performance may (and probably will) vary at least a bit.

Drugo, nijedna od stavki koje su tu ukljuchene ne uzima u obzir sve specifikacije kartice.

3. Niko ne poseduje nishta?

Evo mog primera. Do pre mesec-dva sam u rachunaru imao Radeon 4850, koji ima 800 shadera i 256-bitnu magistralu

Preshao sam na GTX560SE, koja ima 288 CUDA jezgara (3 puta manje) i 192-bitnu magistralu (25% manje).

Shto se radnih taktova tiche, Radeon je ceo zhivot radio na 750 MHz, dok je jezgro 560SE klokovano na 736 MHz.

U "teoretsku" korist 560SE ide samo broj ROP jedinica (24 vs 16), koji i nije toliko bitan zbog nizhe magistrale i GDDR5 vs GDDR3 memorija, koja donosi jedno 15-20% poboljshanja (pogledaj 4850 vs 4870).

I sad ti meni objasni, kojim trikovima sam ja dobio jedno 50% veci FPS u svakoj igri i to bez overkloka, kad bi trebalo da dobijem duplo nizhi fps?

Lepo reche Tadija () iznad, svashta cu josh prochitati...

[Љуша]

GTX 650 Ti To Be Released on October 9th

We are also expecting a third GK106 based card, codenamed GTX 650 SE or GTS 650, which would target $120-$150 segment. The GTX 650 Ti would cost between $160 to $200.

GeForce GTX 650 Ti would have a comparable performance to Radeon HD 7850, but guys over NVIDIA will surely target Radeon HD 7770 with their marketing.

[deluxe]

Opet prave zbrku...

[deluxe]

E pa drugari pogodio sam koliko ce GTX 650Ti da ima CUDA jezgra 576 ali sam omasio bitazu, stavili su "samo" 128bit-a i 1GB GDDR5 RAM-a :/ bummer... a graficki procesor "kuca" na 960Mhz dok je takt memorije na 1350Mhz. link

[Typhoon]

A sta bi ste pre uzeli? Dvoumim se izmedju ove dve.

MSI GeForce GTX 660 2GB
ili
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 660 2GB

Na obe daju 3 godine garancije.

[drow]

jel zna neko dal ce ova gtx 660 raditi u q6600 konfiguraciji? (zbog starijeg slota itd.)

[Rocker]

Radiće bez frke.

[ukimafija]

Isto, razlika ce biti 1% najvise...

[deluxe]

Typhoon kaže:

A sta bi ste pre uzeli? Dvoumim se izmedju ove dve.

MSI GeForce GTX 660 2GB
ili
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 660 2GB

Na obe daju 3 godine garancije.

Opsirno gledano, ljudi sa MSI imaju razna iskustva, pojedinima radi odlicno dok drugima ne radi kako treba, vecinom ih kude. Na Gigabyte jos nisam video da je se neko pozalio.

[drow]

deluxe kaže:

Opsirno gledano, ljudi sa MSI imaju razna iskustva, pojedinima radi odlicno dok drugima ne radi kako treba, vecinom ih kude. Na Gigabyte jos nisam video da je se neko pozalio.

meni npr sa gigayteom crkavao i bio bucan kuler. pre bih uzeo nesto trece xD.

[Љуша]

GTX 650 Ti Review Leaks Out

[Љуша]

ASUS GTX 650 Ti Direct Cu II 1 GB
MSI GTX 650 Ti Power Edition 1 GB
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/forum...gb-review.html
Gigabyte, Zotac, & EVGA Review

[thebluephoenix]

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ Benchmark Reviews – MSI GTX N650Ti Power Edition @ Benchmark Reviews – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ Bjorn3D – ZOTAC GeForce GTX 650 Ti AMP! @ Cowcotland (fr) – MSI GeForce GTX 660 Ti Power Edition @ Guru3D – Gigabyte GeForce GTX 650 Ti OC @ Hardware Secrets – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ Hardware.info – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ Hardwarecanucks – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ HardwareHeaven – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ Hexus.net – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ Hi Tech Legion – ASUS GTX 650 Ti DirectCU II TOP @ Hi Tech Legion – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ HotHardware – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ LAN OC – ASUS GTX 650 Ti DirectCU II TOP @ LAN OC – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ Legit Reviews – ASUS GTX 650 Ti DirectCU II TOP @ Motherboards.org – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ Ninja Lane – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ Overclockers Club – ASUS GTX 650 Ti DirectCU II TOP @ Overclockers Club – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ PureOverclock – ASUS GTX 650 Ti DirectCU II TOP @ PureOverclock – Gigabyte GTX 650 Ti OC @ PureOverclock – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ Rage3D – ZOTAC GeForce GTX 650 Ti AMP! @ T-Break – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ Tech Kings – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ Tech Report – NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti @ TechSpot – ZOTAC GeForce GTX 650 Ti AMP! @ Vortez – Gigabyte GeForce GTX 650 Ti OC @ Vortez – EVGA GeForce GTX 650 Ti 2GB SSC @ OCaholic

[Peruzzi]

Kad mozemo da ocekujemo gtx650ti kod nas u radnjama? Do sad sam bio fixiran na 7770 ali posto vidim da je ova prilicno bolja za neznatno puno para, zeleo bih da je uzmem

[Љуша]

Већ је има. Кошта отприлике 15 700 рсд . И није прилично боља. гт икс 650ти=гт икс 560> ~ 10-15% 7770. 7770 је 3500 динара јефтинија од 650ти. Остани фиксиран на три седмице и нулу

[Peruzzi]

Rado, ali program u kojem radim ne podrzava render preko AMD kartica... >.<

[thebluephoenix]

A 3DCenter.org report shed light on what NVIDIA's GPU lineup for 2013 could look like. According to the report, NVIDIA's next-generation GPUs could follow a similar path to previous-generation "Fermi Refresh" (GF11x), which turned the performance-per-Watt equation around back in favor of NVIDIA, even though the company's current GeForce Kepler has an established energy-efficiency lead. The "Kepler Refresh" family of GPUs (GK11x), according to the report, could see significant increases in cost-performance, with a bit of clever re-shuffling of the GPU lineup.

NVIDIA's GK104 GPU exceeded performance expectations, which allowed it to drive this generation's flagship single-GPU graphics card for NVIDIA, the GTX 680, giving the company time to perfect the most upscaled chip of this generation, and for its foundry partners to refine its 28 nm manufacturing process. When it's time for Kepler Refresh to go to office, TSMC will have refined its process enough for mass-production of GK110, a 7.1 billion transistor chip on which NVIDIA's low-volume Tesla K20 GPU compute accelerator is currently based.
The GK110 will take back the reins of powering NVIDIA's flagship single-GPU product, the GeForce GTX 780. This product could offer a massive 40-55% performance increase over GeForce GTX 680, with a price ranging anywhere between US $499 and $599. The same chip could even power the second fastest single-GPU SKU, the GTX 770. The GK110 physically packs 2880 CUDA cores, and a 384-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface.
...

http://www.techpowerup.com/173851/NV...-Detailed.html

[Љуша]

Peruzzi kaže:

Rado, ali program u kojem radim ne podrzava render preko AMD kartica... >.<

GTX650-Ti Gainward 1GB,DDR5 15 000 рсд

апдејт: GTX650-Ti MSI PE OC 14 500 рсд