[dex3108]

http://www.gamespot.com/articles/why.../1100-6430925/

Within the first two hours of The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt's upcoming expansion, I fought three bosses, angered a royal family, stopped a beheading, committed a beheading, battled the spirits of a legendary bloodline, and attended a wedding while possessed by a sarcastic ghost.

There are still eight more hours of content I haven't even touched.

http://www.vg247.com/2015/09/28/the-...tone-hands-on/

http://www.pcgamer.com/love-giant-fr...rst-expansion/

During the two hours I spent playing Hearts of Stone, the first expansion for The Witcher 3, I gutted a massive frog, crashed a wedding while possessed by a medieval bro-ghost, and was applauded by a man I decapitated seconds prior. Hearts of Stone impresses with how it skirts around the expectations of typical Witcher quest fare and wraps so many surprising, disparate threads together in such a short time. Two hours is only a piece of the proposed 10, and even though Hearts of Stone is structurally familiar, it feels like The Witcher 3 at its best.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/20...-stone-preview

By calling Hearts of Stone an expansion, Polish developer CD Projekt Red set an expectation - an expectation of something grand, and something extraordinary. Ordinary, you see, is downloadable content. Expansions are rarer, bigger beasts. But in the case of Hearts of Stone, 'expansion' is misleading. Sure, it's £8, so it's not comparable to a £35 World of Warcraft expansion, and it has only been in development for around five months, but still: it doesn't quite live up to the billing.